🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where Black people are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to remove Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.